In contract law, the consideration must only be sufficient rather than appropriate. In this context, the value of the consideration is appropriate in view of the economic value of the transaction. However, this does not mean that the validity of the recital is affected. From a legal point of view, the only requirement is that the consideration has a minimum economic value. Jack buys a car from a local used car salesman, Mr. Olson, and the next day he realizes he bought a lemon. He threatens to smash the windows of Olson`s showroom if Olson doesn`t buy the car for $2,150, the purchase price. Mr. Olson agrees.

The deal is questionable, although the underlying deal is fair if Olson feels he has no reasonable alternative and is afraid to accept. Suppose Jack knows that Olson has manipulated the odometers of his cars, a federal offense, and threatens to sue Olson if he doesn`t buy the car. While Olson may be guilty, this threat makes the buyout agreement voidable because it is a personal abuse of a power (go to the police) given to each of us for other purposes. If these threats have failed, we assume that Jack then says to Olson, “I`m going to take you to court and take off your pants.” If Jack thinks he`s going to sue for his purchase price, that`s not an unreasonable threat, because everyone has the right to use the courts to get what they deem legal. But if Jack thought he was fabricating damage that had been caused to him by an alleged (false) manipulation of the odometer, that would be an unreasonable threat. Although Olson can defend himself against the lawsuit, in the meantime, his reputation would suffer from being accused of manipulating the odometer. If you believe you were forced to sign a contract that was not in your best interest, you can take steps to invalidate it. However, it is considered valid until you prove otherwise. For example, if you are sued for breach of the terms of the contract, you could argue that you signed it under duress or undue influence. It`s a good idea to work with a lawyer if you`re involved in a contractual dispute of this nature. Litigation protection on all your contracts with Document Defense® Forcing someone to act against their best judgment or do something they don`t want to do is against the law. In the eyes of the law, any agreement entered into by a person under duress is invalid.

Economic coercion makes a contract voidable when one party threatens to commit an illegal act that would endanger the property or financial well-being of the other party, and the other party can do nothing to avoid the threat except enter into the contract. For example, no matter which side you are on, the best contracts involve an exchange of goods or services that serve the interests of all parties. Being forced (or forced) to sign a contract, whether through coercion or undue influence, can cause problems for everyone involved. If you have questions about contract law or believe you have signed a contract against your will, ask a lawyer about your legal options. Undue influence occurs when one person is able to convince another person`s decisions because of the relationship between the two parties. Often, one of the parties is in a position of power over the other due to high status, higher education, or emotional attachments. The most powerful individual uses this advantage to force the other individual to make decisions that may not be in their long-term interest. The second type of coercion is threat coercion; it is more common than physical coercion. Here, the perpetrator threatens the victim, who believes that there is no reasonable alternative to accepting the treaty.

This makes the contract voidable. This rule contains a number of elements. However, if, by reason of its particular position, one party has knowledge of a material fact and the other party is not aware of it and cannot easily establish it, an obligation to disclose may exist. Non-disclosure would be a problem of secrecy. For example: coercion can occur at any time before the contract is actually signed. For example, Carol`s approach to the negotiation process could be considered bad faith if Carol knew that a subtle threat to Terry`s social status would lead Terry to sign something she would otherwise refuse. It`s possible that someone will force you to sign a contract, but the real question is whether that contract would be valid. If you feel that you have been forced to sign a contract, there are steps you can take to try to prove your case and invalidate the contract. Being forced to sign a contract under duress, also known as coercion, means that you are signing it against your will. In extreme cases, a party may threaten physical violence or even death unless you sign. Psychological pressure or lying about what might happen if you don`t sign can also be seen as coercion. An example of coercion might be telling someone, “If you don`t agree to these terms, you`ll face financial ruin.” The reformulation of contracts (second) characterizes undue influenceVerifiable use of power or trust in a way that deprives one person of his or her free will and replaces the purpose of another.

as an “unjust persuasion”. Reformulation (second) of contracts, Article 177. . .

About Author

blackk